Connect with us


Hun Sen ‘win-win’ legacy debated on Khmer Rouge fall anniversary | Cambodia News





Anlong Veng, Cambodia – In late 1998, Peng Samonn, a war-weary Khmer Rouge cadre who had spent decades fighting in the jungles on the Thai border, got wind of a secret plot to desert the notorious ultra-communists and join Cambodia’s government forces.

“A Khmer Rouge commander told me about divisions and that there would be a defection soon, so to spread the news,” 70-year-old Samonn said earlier this month, sitting outside the same home he lived in under the Khmer Rouge.

“But if another faction had found out, I would have been killed. I shared it with 10 families and we all fled.”

Led by military leader Pol Pot, the Khmer Rouge government had been overthrown almost exactly 20 years before that incident by Vietnamese-backed forces. Around 1.7 million Cambodians had perished in less than four years (1975-1979) as a result of starvation, illness, overwork and murder as the Khmer Rouge’s disastrous agrarian revolution unfolded.

Despite their defeat, the Khmer Rouge continued to fight on, retreating to remote areas and controlling small pockets of the country up until late 1998. Anlong Veng was their final stronghold, overseen by the much-feared Ta Mok, a senior Khmer Rouge leader who died in 2006 while awaiting trial for genocide and crimes against humanity.

Yim Choeun experienced first-hand the ruthlessness of Ta Mok in the 1990s.The 61-year-old currently lives on a sizeable plot of land a short drive from Anlong Veng town, in what used to be called the “Village of Swollen and Rotten Flesh” – a term used for enemies and “capitalists” coined by Pol Pot decades before.

“They accused me and me wife of selling pangolins to the Thais. I was put in a human cage,” he said, adding that he was only released due to a need for manpower amid an offensive from government forces.

“I did not expect to be alive.”

Khmer Rouge soldiers line up before changing into government army fatigues in Anlong Veng (Courtesy Documentation Center of Cambodia/Al Jazeera]

Plans for Khmer Rouge defections to the government were cultivated long before 1998.

In 1991, 19 counties signed the Paris Peace Accords in an effort to end Cambodia’s civil war and put the country on the path towards democracy. Under the terms of the agreement, the United Nations would send a peacekeeping mission to Cambodia (UNTAC) until 1993 – the first time the world body would govern a state –  to supervise a truce and prepare the country for a new constitution and free and fair elections. 

Many in the Khmer Rouge strongholds hoped that the accords could bring an end to the war. These hopes, however, were dashed when the Khmer Rouge leadership boycotted the 1993 national elections and vowed to continue the fight.

The vote was won by Funcinpec, a royalist party led by Prince Norodom Ranariddh, but Hun Sen, of the Cambodian People’s Party (CPP), managed to manoeuvre a power-sharing agreement. A former Khmer Rouge commander, Hun Sen had fled to Vietnam in 1977 to join forces opposing the group, before returning to Cambodia to serve as minister of foreign affairs after the Vietnamese installed a new government in 1979. He became a prime minister in 1985.

Confined in isolated areas, the Khmer Rouge grew weaker from year to year. By 1996, two other Khmer Rouge strongholds in Pailin and Malai had reintegrated with the government, raising alarm bells in Anlong Veng.

Ta Mok then attempted negotiations with Funcinpec royalists behind the back of Pol Pot. The move appeared to act as a catalyst for factional fighting between forces loyal to Funcinpec and to CPP in 1997, resulting in the latter securing full control until this day, in what many define as a coup d’etat.

Over the next year, the Khmer Rouge disintegrated further through infighting, as well as defections to the government under Prime Minister Hun Sen’s self-styled “win-win” policy which saw the peaceful reintegation of former fighters into Cambodian society.

“On December 4, 1998, both sides reached an agreement marking the final chapter of the KR (Khmer Rouge) defection and ultimate dissolution of the KR remnants who had struggled against the government for nearly twenty-eight years,” wrote Dy Khamboly and Christopher Dearing in A History of the Anlong Veng Community.

“In addition, all former KR soldiers and civilians would be recognised as legal citizens of Cambodia, with the right to retain their current property as well as hold administrative positions in the area.”

In a set of highly orchestrated “reintegration” ceremonies in Anlong Veng in early 1999, Khmer Rouge soldiers downed their weapons and changed into government fatigues.

Hun Sen’s “win-win” policy was completed.

Khmer Rouge cadres stand in front of piles of weapons during a reintegration ceremony in Anlong Veng in early 1999 [Courtesy Documentation Center of Cambodia/Al Jazeera]

On Saturday, tens of thousands of people are expected to attend the inauguration of the “Win-Win Monument” in the capital, Phnom Penh, to celebrate 20 years since the Khmer Rouge finally fell and two of its leaders – Nuon Chea and Khieu Samphan – visited Hun Sen for peace talks. Both are now serving double life sentences for crimes, including genocide.

Hun Sen has long credited the “win-win policy” for terminating the fighting, touting the end of the civil war as perhaps his greatest achievement. But while this was a landmark moment in recent Cambodian history, Hun Sen has also been accused of using the term for ulterior motives.

Last year, shortly before the highly controversial dissolution of his only credible electoral threat, the Cambodia National Rescue Party, Hun Sen had told opposition commune councillors that they could hold on to their jobs if they defected to the ruling party.

“This is a win-win policy,” he said.

Sebastian Strangio, author of Hun Sen’s Cambodia, said the prime minister deserves credit for engineering the military offensives and political deals that led to the breakup of the Khmer Rouge.

However, he believes Hun Sen has since exploited its legacy for his own political objectives.

“Of course, this achievement has since been rolled into a totalising political claim that raises up the CPP as the only legitimate representative of the Cambodian people, and paints its opponents as enemies bent on rekindling the civil war,” he said.

“While all the ‘win-win’ talk is to an extent based on a real achievement, it is now used as a political cudgel to shut down debate and foreclose any feasible alternative to the current ruling party.”

Political analyst Lao Mong Hay argued that, more than anything, the “win-win” policy was a display of political opportunism on the part of Hun Sen, who is one the world’s longest-serving prime ministers.

“What he did was just a finishing touch to end the war. It was morally questionable, surrendering to evil then rewarding the evil doers, the Khmer Rouge,” said Mong Hay, adding that the move was down to Hun Sen’s efforts to legitimise his rule after losing the 1993 elections to Funcinpec.

Mong Hay also agued it was an attempt to undermine UNTAC, which oversaw the 1993 ballot but failed to end the civil war.

“The CPP lost the election, meaning its rule from 1991 was not legitimate and confirmed the acknowledgment by the international community that the regime was a puppet of Vietnam. That factor contributed to Hun Sen extolling his ‘win-win’ policy’,” said Mong Hay.

“It was like a molehill turned into a mountain.”

A billboard of Prime Minister Hun Sen next to Ta Mok Lake in Anlong Veng [George Wright/Al Jazeera]

But in Anlong Veng, support for Hun Sen and his ruling party is widespread. Despite initial concerns about his assurances over the “win-win” policy, Samonn is thankful that himself and others were allowed to carry on with their lives in peace.

“Right after the reintegration and ‘win-win’ policy, I was sceptical because the Khmer Rouge technically lost the war and from my experience, when the Khmer Rouge came to power, they killed their rivals,” he said.

“But Hun Sen stayed true to his word.”

Kheng Pha, a 64-year-old former Khmer Rouge official who is now a CPP village chief in Anlong Veng, agrees.

“The ‘win-win policy’ is a great policy, it’s one of a kind in this world,” he said, speaking beneath a poster showing Hun Sen sitting in a rural field alongside the words, “Our hope, our village, our country, our future”.

“We could all win and end the war, even the losers could not lose. Soldiers changed from communist to democrats, we had salaries,” he added.

“Communism couldn’t win against democracy.”

Additional reporting by Phath Bora

Kheng Pha, a former Khmer Rouge soldier who is now a ruling party village chief, outside his home in Anlong Veng [George Wright/Al Jazeera] 


Source link

قالب وردپرس






When Ontario declared a COVID-19 health emergency last spring, the first instinct of Ottawa entrepreneur Peter O’Blenis was to preserve cash.

“We basically stopped our discretionary spending,” said O’Blenis, the co-founder and CEO of Evidence Partners, which makes software for accelerating the review of scientific and medical literature, using artificial intelligence. “We cut investments in things meant to help us grow.”

It was a defensive posture born of experience. O’Blenis had 12 years earlier nearly been crushed by the global financial crisis. Another looked to be on the way.

In 2008, O’Blenis and his colleagues, Jonathan Barker and Ian Stefanison, hit a brick wall with their first venture, TrialStat, which helped hospitals manage patients’ electronic data. While TrialStat had secured $5.5 million in venture financing just a couple of years earlier, the founders had burned through most of it during a rapid expansion. When the financial world collapsed, so did their firm.

The trio played things far more conservatively with Evidence Partners, which has relied almost exclusively on customer revenues to finance expansion.

The caution proved unnecessary. Like so many other businesses, O’Blenis underestimated the government’s willingness to keep the economy afloat with easy money. Nor did he anticipate that COVID-19 would prove a significant catalyst for the firm’s revenues so soon.

Evidence Partners is hardly the only local firm with technology particularly suited for the war against COVID-19. Spartan Bioscience and DNA Genotek adapted existing products to create technology for identifying the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19. Ottawa-based units of Abbott Laboratories and Siemens Healthineers make portable blood analyzers that diagnose patients afflicted by the virus.

Continue Reading


Shepherds of Good Hope wants to expand ByWard Market operation with eight-storey housing complex





The Shepherds of Good Hope plans to build an eight-storey building near its current shelter for the homeless in the ByWard Market that would include supportive housing for up to 48 people, a soup kitchen and a drop-in centre.

The organization says it wants to be part of the solution to the housing crisis that has fuelled a rise in homelessness in Ottawa.

People would be moved out of the emergency shelters and into their own tiny apartments in the complex, which would include a communal dining hall and staff available to help with mental health, addiction and medical problems, said Caroline Cox, senior manager of communications for the Shepherds.

Some residents in the neighbourhood are opposed, saying services for the homeless and vulnerable should not be concentrated in one area of the city.

“I was flabbergasted,” said homeowner Brian Nolan, who lives one block from the development proposed for 216 Murray St., where currently a one-story building houses offices for the Shepherds of Good Hope.

Nolan said that, in the 15 years he’s lived in the area, it has become increasingly unsafe, with home and car thefts, drug dealing, loitering, aggressive and erratic behaviour, urinating, defecating and vomiting on sidewalks and yards and sexual acts conducted in public on his dead-end street. Before he lets his son play basketball in the yard, he checks the ground for needles and his home security camera to see who is nearby.

Continue Reading


Carleton University Hosts the Forum Lecture: Towards a Feminist Post-COVID City





evehe Carleton University Forum Lecture: Towards a Feminist Post-COVID City given by Leslie Kern launches Ottawa Architecture Week. Urban geographer, author and academic, Kern will discuss how the pandemic has highlighted long-standing inequalities in the design, use and inclusivity of urban spaces. The talk will share some of the core principles behind a feminist urban vision to inform a wider vision of justice, equity and sustainability.

: Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2021 at 6:30 p.m.

About the Speaker

Kern holds a PhD in Women’s Studies from York University. She is currently an associate professor of Geography and Environment and director of Women’s and Gender Studies at Mount Allison University.

Kern is the author of two books on gender and cities, including Feminist City: Claiming Space in a Man-Made World (Verso). The book discusses how our cities have failed in terms of fear, motherhood, friendship, activism, the joy and perils of being alone, and also imagines what they could become.

Kern argues, “The pandemic has shown us that society can be radically reorganized if necessary. Let’s carry that lesson into creating the non-sexist city.”

Continue Reading