Connect with us

Buzz

The new citizenship bill and the Hinduisation of India | Human Rights

Editor

Published

on

[ad_1]

On January 8, India‘s lower house of parliament approved a bill that would grant residency and citizenship rights to undocumented non-Muslim immigrants, sparking protests in the country’s northeast. The protests took place mainly in the state of Assam, where millions of people were accused of being foreigners and effectively stripped of their citizenship last year.

The controversial Citizenship (Amendment) Bill 2016, which still needs the approval of the upper house of parliament, seeks to amend the 1955 Citizenship Act to make Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians from three Muslim-majority countries – Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan – eligible for Indian citizenship. This would mean migrants belonging to these religious communities who entered India without the necessary documents prior to 2014 would not be imprisoned or deported and would gain permanent citizenship after six years of residency in India.

The government says the bill aims to provide succour to persons who have been persecuted in their homelands because of their religious identities and who have “nowhere else to go but India”. The proposal assumes persons who identify as Muslim cannot be persecuted in Muslim-dominated countries, and therefore excludes all Muslim immigrants. Hence, members of the Ahmadiya and Shia communities of Pakistan, despite being persistently targeted by extremists, would not be able to seek refuge in India. 

The bill has been widely criticised for attempting to make religion an eligibility criterion for Indian citizenship – an act that would fundamentally alter the secular character of India.

Ignoring minorities from non-Muslim states

Critics have questioned the reasons behind the government’s decision to limit the scope of this bill to migrants from Muslim-majority neighbours of India. Some have argued that the fact that the proposal excludes thousands of undocumented immigrants from Sri Lanka, Nepal and most importantly Myanmar implies that the Indian government is not at all concerned about the persecution of minorities if they are not living in Muslim-majority countries.






India slammed for deporting Rohingya refugees (6:11)

Indeed, when members of Myanmar’s Muslim Rohingya minority sought refuge in India after being persecuted in their home country for their religious and ethnic identity, the Indian government did not attempt to provide any legal protection for them. On the contrary, the members of the government perceived these desperate refugees as a threat to India and made attempts to force them out of the country.

In this context, the claim that this bill is a humanitarian gesture aiming to help people in need does not hold. So what is the Indian government’s real motivation for supporting this bill?

Protecting India’s ‘Hindu identity’

The governing Hindu-nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) main strategist for the northeast, Himanta Biswa Sarma, recently exposed the real purpose of this bill: protecting India’s so-called Hindu identity.

Before the citizenship bill was put to a vote in the lower house of parliament, Sarma, who is also the finance minister of the state of Assam, said, “If this Bill is not passed, then Hindus in Assam will become a minority in just next five years. That will be advantageous to those elements who want Assam to be another Kashmir and a part of the uncertain phase there.” 

And soon after the bill was passed, the minister argued that this decision may have prevented Muslims from taking control of Assam’s 17 assembly seats and the Muslim leader of the All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF), Badruddin Ajmal, from becoming the chief minister.

By using the potential electoral success of Muslim Indian citizens, who have every right to contest and hold public positions, as a way to legitimise the citizenship bill, Sarma clearly demonstrated that the purpose of this bill is not to “help” anyone, but to protect and promote Hindu supremacy in India.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has also previously admitted that the bill is tied to his party’s desire to make India a Hindu nation that prioritises the rights of Hindus irrespective of their citizenship.

During a rally in Assam’s Bengali-Hindu dominated region of Silchar, Modi said that the citizenship bill is an “atonement for the past mistakes of partition”. Emphasising that he believes blood relations are more important than the “colour of passports”, he promised the region’s Bengali-speaking Hindus that he would make sure that they will be accepted and welcomed by “mother India” by passing this bill.

Alienating Assam’s indigenous population

Today, Assam is at the centre of protests about the proposed amendment to India’s citizenship bill and this public anger has historical roots.

During Bangladesh’s bloody struggle for liberation from Pakistan in the early 1970s, many Bengalis moved to Assam. Over the years, their increasing numbers stirred anxieties among the indigenous Assamese people about the preservation of their distinct culture and ownership of land. As a result, between 1979 and 1985, an “anti-foreigner” agitation – dubbed the “Assam movement”, targeting the Bengali immigrants – erupted in the state. 

To end the violence, India’s central government signed the Assam accord with the leaders of the Assam movement in 1985. The accord specified that only people who could prove that either they or their parents had entered or lived in India prior to March 1971 can assume Indian citizenship and legally reside in the state of Assam.

Last year, a new National Register of Citizens (NRC) was prepared in the state to distinguish Indian citizens from undocumented immigrants according to the rules set by the 1985 accord. This list included only 28.9 million of the 32.9 million people residing in the state, rendering nearly four million people stateless. 

The decision to denationalise millions of people was widely supported by Assam’s indigenous population, which still fears their culture may be decimated by the influx of “foreigners” and widely criticised by India’s Bengali communities and international observers. The Assamese’s main fear is that Bangla-speaking people from neighbouring Bangladesh, irrespective of their religion, would come to dominate Assam. Hindu and Muslim Assamese are united on this viewpoint and they all want undocumented immigrants to be kicked out of the state. 

However, with this new citizenship bill, the BJP government is trying to convince Assamese Hindus that their loyalty should lie not with the indigenous Muslim communities of their state – who speak their language – but with Bengali Hindus. For now, the majority of Assamese Hindus seem not convinced by Hindu nationalist arguments.

The Assam Gana Parishad (AGP), the successor of the Assam movement, has already severed ties with the BJP and expressed its displeasure over the move. The AGP and its allies see in this move an attempt by the BJP to lure as many Hindus from Bangladesh as possible to this region, which, they think, would make it Bengali-dominated and eclipse the local cultures.

Another step towards Hinduisation of India

The citizenship bill needs to be seen as a part of the BJP’s larger ideological and political agenda to transform India into a “Hindu homeland”. The governing party believes India belongs to Hindus and everyone else are invaders, or at best latecomers, who should expect nothing more than a guest status.

The BJP is clearly using this bill to send a message to the Hindus in other parts of India that under their rule, “Hindus will always come first”.

From the very beginning, the BJP viewed the NRC as way to rid the country of Muslim “foreigners”. Using this citizenship bill, the governing party is trying to make sure no Hindus are harmed by the NRC and their quest to expel Muslims from India can continue without complications.

If this bill gets the approval of the upper house in the coming days, it will not only cause division and conflict in the northeast of India but will significantly contribute to the ongoing Hinduisation of India.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.

[ad_2]

Source link

قالب وردپرس

Buzz

The Daily Beast doubles down on its journo-terrorism tactics that doxxed a black Trump supporter and subjected him to potential violence from deranged Leftists

Editor

Published

on

By

(Natural News) If this doesn’t prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Left-wing “mainstream media” is no longer focused on news that informs our citizenry with an aim towards improving and strengthening our republic, nothing will.

Apparently because nothing else is more important in this day and age, The Daily Beast assigned a reporter to look for the person who trolled House Speaker Nancy Pelosi with a meme that pokes fun at her inability to get through news conferences these days without sounding like she’s wasted.

What’s more, the reporter — Kevin Poulsen — managed to learn the identity of the person because someone at Facebook readily revealed him.

According to Poulsen’s article, the claimed he was looking for a “Russian troll behind the ‘Drunk Pelosi’ viral video” — because to the Left, only ‘Russians’ would dare make fun of Democrats in the first place. 

“Turns out he’s an itinerant forklift operator from the Bronx who’s been secretly running hard-right ‘news’ outlets across social media for years,” Poulsen tweeted. “Also, not Russian.”

From Poulsen’s story:

On May 22, a Donald Trump superfan and occasional sports blogger from the Bronx named Shawn Brooks posted a video clip of Nancy Pelosi on his personal Facebook page. The clip showed Pelosi at her most excitable, stammering during a press conference as she voiced frustration over an abortive infrastructure meeting with the president. Brooks’ commentary on the video was succinct: “Is Pelosi drunk?”

Thirteen minutes after that, the ‘offending’ forklift driver — Shawn Brooks, who is black and conservative — posted a different Pelosi video to a Facebook page called, “Politics Watchdog, which is “one of a series of hyper partisan news operations Brooks runs (with help, he claims),” Poulsen wrote.

Facebook should be sued, and should LOSE

Brooks, Poulsen wrote, would go on to post “the same doctored video” to a second Facebook page that he manages, AllNews 24/7. “This clip was identical to the Politics WatchDog video on every way, except that it didn’t carry the Politics WatchDog branding that was superimposed over the earlier video,” Poulsen wrote.

Wow, what a sleuth. And of course, The Daily Beast’s editor doubled down on the journo-terrorism during an appearance Sunday on CNN, whose host, little Brian Stelter never questioned him. 

Not only was Facebook an accessory in Poulsen’s act of journo-terrorism — through the doxxing of Brooks — but the platform also cut off Brooks’ source of income from the video after it had already earned $1,000. (Related: New alternatives to Twitter, Google, Facebook rapidly emerging: These sites won’t censor you.)

“We have zero interest in making money from fake news and our policy is to not allow people to make money from content that has been rated false by a fact-checker,” the company said in a statement. 

Unless, of course, that fake news is coming from Leftist “mainstream” sources like The Daily Beast, The New York Times, the Washington Post, or CNN, all of which have been responsible for publishing scores of phony reports claiming or suggesting the 2016 Trump campaign “colluded” with Russia to “steal the election from Hillary Clinton,” or that special counsel Robert Mueller’s report claims the president “obstructed justice” (it does not).

Facebook helped The Daily Beast dox a user who cannot sue — or so the platform thought. According to The Gateway Pundit, Brooks has started a GoFundMe page to raise money for a legal action.

Here’s hoping Brooks raises plenty of cash to sue the pants off of Mark Zuckerberg and his loathsome platform. What a sellout he is to authoritarianism.

This journo-terrorism has to stop. It’s no wonder no one trusts any media, even those of us who regularly report the truth.

Continue Reading

Buzz

Hollywood studios’ demand for round-the-clock abortions reveals demonic sickness and psychopathy of the “entertainment” industry, including Disney

Editor

Published

on

By

(Natural News) The American entertainment industry, which is almost entirely dominated by Leftists, absolutely hates human life. In fact, Hollywood is so anti-human life that nearly every production studio that currently makes films, television shows, or commercials in the state of Georgia is threatening to leave over the state’s recently signed-into-law “heartbeat” bill to protect the lives of unborn human babies from being aborted after their heartbeats become detectable, which is around six weeks gestation.

(Natural News) The American entertainment industry, which is almost entirely dominated by Leftists, absolutely hates human life. In fact, Hollywood is so anti-human life that nearly every production studio that currently makes films, television shows, or commercials in the state of Georgia is threatening to leave over the state’s recently signed-into-law “heartbeat” bill to protect the lives of unborn human babies from being aborted after their heartbeats become detectable, which is around six weeks gestation.

Hollywood claims that its threats are somehow virtuous because “women’s health” is now supposedly at risk. It’s as though there’s no other way to avoid pregnancy, according to Hollywood Leftists, than to stab an unborn baby in the head, tear apart its tiny limbs, and either dispose of the remains or sell them on the black market to buy Lamborghinis.

It’s just ancient paganism repackaged, abortion being an act of mass sacrifice to the Canaanite god Moloch, which Hollywood and the rest of the Left Cult somehow believes is good and moral. But to everyone else, it’s about as Satanic as it gets to suggest that protecting unborn human life represents “oppression,” and something worthy of economic retaliation.

“There is no higher value in our cosmopolitan overlords’ minds than a woman’s ability to kill her own baby free from any consequence,” writes Chris Menahan for Information Liberation about the absolute derangement of today’s Leftists. “Abortion is their bible, abortion is their religion … Abortion is a religious sacrament.”

Sponsored solution from the Health Ranger Store: The Big Berkey water filter removes almost 100% of all contaminants using only the power of gravity (no electricity needed, works completely off-grid). Widely consider the ultimate “survival” water filter, the Big Berkey is made of stainless steel and has been laboratory verified for high-efficiency removal of heavy metals by CWC Labs, with tests personally conducted by Mike Adams. Explore more here.

“Women must be allowed to kill their own babies at any point – even post-birth – and then throw their aborted babies straight into the trash to thunderous applause … This is ‘our values.’ This is ‘who we are,’” Menahan adds.

For related news, be sure to check out Abortions.news and LiberalMob.com.

If you support Hollywood with your dollars, you’re fueling the continued Satanic practice of mass sacrificing unborn human lives

Keep in mind that it’s not just Netflix that’s threatening to boycott Georgia over its heartbeat bill. Nearly every major production company from WarnerMedia to CBS Corp. to Viacom Inc. to NBCUniversal, as well as Disney, wants round-the-clock access to abortion or infanticide in Georgia.

According to Bob Iger, the current head of Disney, the children’s programming company will have a “very difficult” time continuing to make productions in Georgia if the state’s heartbeat law persists unchallenged – because Hollywood actresses, in case you didn’t know, can’t keep their legs closed, and thus have to maintain unmitigated access to Planned Parenthood in order to quickly and easily dispose of their “clumps of cells” in between takes.

This is the filth you’re supporting, America, every time you renew your Netflix subscription, pay your cable bill, or go to the movies for “date night.” There’s no longer a valid excuse for continuing to shell out cash to Mystery Babylon’s entertainment-industrial complex, which is all but completely controlled by Satan-worshippers with a bloodlust for unborn human corpses.

Commenting on both the irony and hypocrisy of Hollywood studios colluding with one another to overturn the democratic process in Georgia, a page known as “Woke Capital” tweeted acerbically in response to Hollywood’s threats against the Peach State:

“Democracy is a $157B market cap corporation (Netflix) fighting in court to overturn a state law, with threat of economic sanctions should they not get their way.”

In other words, these Hollywood demons are doing exactly what they’ve been falsely accusing President Trump of having done while on the campaign trail, projection being another Leftist “virtue” that rears its ugly head every time a Leftist doesn’t get his or her way.

Continue Reading

Buzz

5 ways to make the most out of your MBA program

Editor

Published

on

By

Most prospective candidates typically calculate their return on investment (ROI) of their MBA degree before venturing into it. However, while looking through the figures and equations that are typically centred around life after graduation, many people overlook the returns that exist even while still working through the program.

While these returns are not typically financial in nature, they may still be responsible for impacting your financing or improving the quality of your in other non-financial ways.

Here are some benefits of an MBA to consider while beginning your program that would guarantee you instant ROI while still in school.

1.  Advancement in your career prior to graduation

For quite a number of MBA students, they still continue to work either full-time or part-time jobs while earning their degree. However, these set of students are likely to begin getting early returns from their MBA program.

Students can begin applying what they’ve learnt in the classroom in real business world scenarios and the sooner you begin doing this, the earlier you’d reap the financial benefits from your business.

Bachenheimer, a clinical professor of management at Pace University’s Lubin School of Business in New York City, noted that an MBA provides project-based learning activities that allow students to practice solving real business problems.

“An MBA can be much more than the knowledge and skills acquired through coursework; it can truly expand you and your world,” he said in a report.

For example, while applying the knowledge acquired from your MBA classes to your current job, you could earn yourself a raise or a promotion from your current employer—giving you a more lucrative financial position while still studying.

2.  Improves your time management and prioritization skills

As an MBA student, it is important to learn strategic prioritization which is a critical soft skill and integral element of every MBA coursework. However, it also has practical applications which can be extended to your personal and professional life.

Many MBA students juggle a lot of time-consuming but yet critical commitments in addition to their coursework—be it a full or part-time job, family, internship, relationship, volunteer work, social calendar or an organized team sport.

Therefore, learning prioritization is important to not only your degree but to your range of personal commitments.

3.  Access to career support services

One obvious way to impact your MBA’s financial ROI is to take advantage of the services offered by your institution to potentially secure a more lucrative job title and salary.

Taking advantage to these career support services offered by your school strengthens your position as a job seeker even before you graduate as you’d have a better resume, cover letter, networking and interview skills to land the job of your dreams.

According to SFGate, earning a better position and higher salary are the two key reasons prospective MBA students decide to pursue the degree. Therefore, apart from giving students the required hard and soft skills needed to excel in the business world, some MBA programs offer services that help its students secure better opportunities.

For example, with the need for data scientists on the rise, enrolling in an online data science masters program not only gives you the required skills to excel as a data scientist but can help you secure a role in a prestigious organization.

4.  Grow your professional network

This is one advantage that cannot be overemphasized as your fellow students are most likely among the foundational members of a growing list of an invaluable professional network.

It is important to follow up with business connections at your school—be it, teachers, students, visiting faculty or guest speakers—as the connections you make during your MBA program can last a lifetime and lead to personal or work changing opportunities.

During your time as a student, offer assistance—and equally, accept it from—your fellow students as doing this establishes and nurtures relationships even before you graduate.

Apart from students, the professors and faculty working within your MBA program can also be important members of your professional network. They can provide their expertise and a long list of career-related experiences you may need during an exam, business meeting, or product pitch.

The more time you invest in building a professional network while still in school, the more value and higher ROI you’d get from your MBA program.

5.  Acquiring better listening skills

Being able to not just hear the words someone says but understanding the sentiments and context behind them is one the most sort after and invaluable skill sets across industries.

Listening is a fantastic way to strengthen your critical thinking, making you become a more intuitive thinker and a faster problem solver.For example, good listening skills can be the distinction you need to stand out from other candidates during a job interview as you’d be able to clearly interpret and answer the questions directed at you.

Therefore, it is important to hone your listening skills during in-class discussions, team meetings, job interviews and when pitching ideas to classmates during group projects.

Though this benefit is hard to quantify in terms of figures, it is a great way to attain your desired ROI while still studying.

Continue Reading

Chat

Trending