Connect with us


Saskatchewan makes its legal case, arguing federal carbon tax is unconstitutional





Saskatchewan’s legal battle against the carbon tax is not about whether climate change is real, but whether the federal government is violating provincial jurisdiction with its price on pollution, one of the province’s lawyers said Wednesday in its constitutional challenge to Ottawa’s policy.

“The government of Saskatchewan is not made up of a bunch of climate change deniers,” lawyer Mitch McAdam said in his opening remarks to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal in Regina on Wednesday morning.

“The government recognizes that climate change is a serious issue that has to be addressed and that effective measures are required to deal with greenhouse gas emissions. None of that is in dispute.”

Instead, the case is about what powers the federal government has and doesn’t have, McAdam said at the start of two days of hearings.

Watch the court proceedings in full here

Saskatchewan is asking its highest court to answer this question: “The Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act was introduced into Parliament on March 28, 2018, as Part 5 of Bill C-74. If enacted, will this act be unconstitutional in whole or in part?”

Paul Jacobson, lawyer for the province, argued against the federal government’s position that the pricing act falls under the peace, order and good government clause in the 1867 Constitution, saying the use of that clause now and in the future is “sweeping, radical and intrusive.” 

He called this move disrespectful to the sovereignty of Canadian provinces, saying, “Ottawa is not a big brother over provinces.” 

The federal government argues climate change is a matter of national concern, and definitively falls under the peace, order and good government clause. 

Here’s everything you need to know about the carbon tax court case, explained in two minutes:  

Why is Saskatchewan facing off against the federal government in court? CBC’s Madeline Kotzer explains how this constitutional tête-à-tête will play out. 2:12

The province argues the carbon levy is an unfair, uneven, illegal tax and that it violates provincial jurisdiction.

The federal government argues it’s a regulatory charge, not a tax, and so it has jurisdiction because carbon emissions are a matter of “national concern.”

For its case, Ottawa says: “We have been expanding federal jurisdiction under the peace, order good government clause over and over again for half a century. For a century we barely used it but we’ve been using it more. And each time it happens, it feels kind of big,” said John Whyte, a constitutional lawyer and former deputy attorney general of Saskatchewan.

“[Canada] will have to have the court believe that measures to reduce carbon emissions into the atmosphere is a matter of concern to the nation.”

Whyte said that in his opinion, the federal government’s case is stronger than Saskatchewan’s.

“There is no knockdown winning argument for the province here.”

Both Canada and Saskatchewan get three hours to make their arguments: Saskatchewan on Wednesday morning and the federal government on Thursday morning.

There are 16 interveners in the reference case:

  • Seven on Wednesday in favour of Saskatchewan.
  • Nine on Thursday in favour of the federal government.
  • Three provinces — Ontario, New Brunswick and British Columbia — that will each get 30 minutes to address the court.
  • The 13 others interveners will receive 15 minutes each, including for an address and questions from the judges.

CBC Saskatchewan reporter Adam Hunter is in court to cover the legal challenge. Follow what’s happening through his tweets below. For those on mobile, click here.

Saskatchewan’s argument

The province of Saskatchewan is asking the court to rule the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act is unconstitutional and should be declared beyond federal authority or void and unenforceable.

The province argues the federal government cannot impose a policy that treats provinces unequally.

“This case is not about the risks posed to the country by climate change,” reads the province’s written argument.
“This case is not even about whether a carbon tax is a good or a bad way to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that fuel climate change. This case is fundamentally about the nature of our federation.

“The legislation is unconstitutional because it disregards fundamental principles of Canadian constitutional law, in particular, the principles of federalism.”

Lawyers representing the position of Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe’s government are facing off with lawyers representing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on the right to impose a carbon tax on provinces. Two days of hearings in a Regina court began Wednesday. (Matt Smith/The Canadian Press)

Don Morgan, Saskatchewan’s minister of justice, said the federal government cannot tax provinces differently based on how much they like or dislike a specific province’s plan to reduce carbon emissions.

“Our goal is not to have a carbon tax in our province, and this is our ability to challenge,” Morgan said.

“Politically it’s important for the message to the people of our province that we are sticking up for them, that this is something that’s fundamentally important to us as an oil-producing, energy-exporting province.”

Morgan said the province would not seek an injunction if its case is unsuccessful.

The government of Canada’s argument

“Canada seeks the court’s opinion that the whole of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act is validly enacted under Parliament’s power to pass laws for the peace, order and good government of the nation as a whole respecting GHG emissions, being a matter of national concern,” reads the government of Canada’s argument.

Its submission asks the court, if it rules against the federal case, that it suspend its declaration until after the Supreme Court of Canada makes a ruling in the event of an appeal.

“Pollution is a national concern. Carbon pollution doesn’t know any borders,” federal Environment Minister Catherine McKenna said.

“Unfortunately some provinces did not step up, unfortunately provinces led by Conservative politicians, who believe it should be free to pollute.”

Conservative leaders unite

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe and his ministers have repeatedly said they believe they have a strong case and will sway the court.

He has allies in Ontario Premier Doug Ford, New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs and Alberta Opposition Leader Jason Kenney, all of whom made their provinces interveners in Saskatchewan’s case.

In 2017, a University of Manitoba legal scholar was commissioned by that province’s government to give a legal opinion on the constitutionality of the federal carbon tax plan. Bryan Schwartz determined Ottawa had the right to impose a carbon tax on Manitoba and other provinces — but the provinces have a good legal argument to make for their own carbon pricing plans.

“If we just say no, we get [Prime Minister Justin] Trudeau. If we go to court, we lose,” Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister said in October 2017.

One year later, Pallister announced the province would leave the federal framework. He said the province would pursue the courts, but did not sign on as an intervener in the Saskatchewan case.

The court has given CBC permission to live stream proceedings. You can watch on our website beginning at 9:30 a.m. CST on Wednesday.

Schedule in order of appearance


  • Province of Saskatchewan – 3 hours.
  • Province of Ontario – 30 minutes.
  • Province of New Brunswick – 30 minutes.
  • SaskPower and SaskEnergy – 15 minutes.
  • The Canadian Taxpayers Federation – 15 minutes.
  • United Conservative Party (Alberta’s provincial Opposition party) – 15 minutes.
  • Agricultural Producers Association of Saskatchewan – 15 minutes.
  • International Emissions Trading Association – 15 minutes.


  • Government of Canada – 3 hours.
  • Province of British Columbia – 30 minutes.
  • The Canadian Public Health Association – 15 minutes.
  • Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation – 15 minutes.
  • Canadian Environmental Law Association And Environmental Defence Canada – 15 minutes.
  • Assembly of First Nations – 15 minutes.
  • David Suzuki Foundation – 15 minutes.
  • Ecofiscal Commission of Canada – 15 minutes.
  • Intergenerational Climate Coalition – 15 minutes.
  • Climate Justice et. al – 15 minutes.
  • Province of Saskatchewan (reply).


Source link

قالب وردپرس


Ottawa Book Expo 2020 – Authors, Publishers look forward to a top-notch Canadian book fair





Diversity has always been a complex issue, no matter where you look.Case in point, world-famous writer, Stephen King, has recently come under criticism for his views on diversity. The best-selling author had stated, “I would never consider diversity in matters of art, only quality. It seems to me that to do otherwise would be wrong.” Many criticized the novelist as being out of touch and “ignorant,” but one cannot deny that King’s opinions on diversity, mirror the thoughts of a whole lot of people in the creative industry.

The Toronto Book Expo is coming back in 2020, with a multi-cultural concept that aims to include marginalized authors.  The Expo intends to celebrate literary works of diverse cultural backgrounds, and the entire literary community in Canada is expectant. Book-lovers and writers alike, are invited to three days of uninhibited literary celebration where diverse cultural works will be prioritized. At the event, authors will be allowed to share their culture with a broad audience. The audience will be there specifically to purchase multi-cultural works.

Multicultural literary expos do not come every day. In Canada, there is a noticeable lack of literary events celebrating other cultures. This leads to a significantly lower amount of cultural diversity in the industry. The Toronto Book Expo would aim at giving more recognition to these marginalized voices. Understandably, more recognizable work will be prioritized.

The Toronto Book Expo is making a statement that diversity is needed in the literary community. The statement is truly motivating, especially if you consider the fact that this could mean more culturally diverse works of literature.

There is a lot of noticeable cultural ignorance in literature. This is an issue that needs to be addressed and books are one of the best means of improving multi-cultural diversity in literature. The Toronto Book Expo is going to fully utilize books to fight ignorance in the literary industry.

Real progress cannot be made if there is a substantial amount of ignorant people in the industry. In spite of advancements made in education in recent years, there is still a considerable percentage of adults who remain unable to read and write.The Toronto Book Expo aims to bring awareness to social literacy issues such as illiteracy.

It is important to uphold high literacy levels in the community and to support those who are uneducated. A thriving society cannot be achieved if the community is not able to read their civil liberties and write down their grievances.

The major foundation of a working and dynamic society is entrenched in literature. Literature offers us an understandingof the changes being made to our community.

The event would go on for three days at three different venues. Day 1 would hold at the York University Student & Convention Centre at 15 Library Lane on March 19. Day 2 would be held at the Bram and BlumaAppel Salon Facility on the second floor of the main Toronto Reference Library near Yonge and Bloor Streets in downtown Toronto on March 21 and day 3 of the expo would take place at the internationally famous Roy Thomson Hall.

Continue Reading


A Week In Ottawa, ON, On A $75,300 Salary





Welcome to Money Diaries, where we’re tackling what might be the last taboo facing modern working women: money. We’re asking millennials how they spend their hard-earned money during a seven-day period — and we’re tracking every last dollar.Attention, Canadians! We’re featuring Money Diaries from across Canada on a regular basis, and we want to hear from you. Submit your Money Diary here.Today: a biologist working in government who makes $75,300 per year and spends some of her money this week on a bathing suit. Occupation: Biologist
Industry: Government
Age: 27
Location: Ottawa, ON
Salary: $75,300
Paycheque Amount (2x/month): $1,930
Gender Identity: Woman

Continue Reading


Ottawa doctor pens nursery rhyme to teach proper handwashing





An Ottawa doctor has turned to song to teach kids — and adults, for that matter — how to wash their hands to prevent the spread of germs.

Dr. Nisha Thampi, an infectious disease physician at CHEO, the area’s children’s hospital, created a video set to the tune of Frère Jacques and featuring the six-step handwashing method recommended by the World Health Organization.

Thampi’s 25-second rendition, which was co-authored by her daughter and Dr. Yves Longtin, an infectious disease specialist at the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal, is featured in the December issue of The BMJ, or British Medical Journal. 

Thampi said as an infectious disease physician and a mother of two, she thinks a lot about germs at home and school.

“I was trying to find a fun way to remember the stuff,” she said. “There are six steps that have been codified by the World Health Organization, but they’re complex and hard to remember.” 

Thampi said she came up with the idea to rewrite the lyrics to the nursery rhyme on World Hand Hygiene Day in May, when she was thinking about how to help people remember the technique. 

She said studies have shown that handwashing is effective in reducing the risk of diarrhea-related illnesses and respiratory diseases. 

“So I’d say it’s one of the most important and easiest things we can do.”

The video includes such often-overlooked steps as “wash the back,” “twirl the tips around” and “thumb attack,” which pays special attention to the first digit.

Continue Reading