Connect with us

Headlines

Allégations d’ingérence : le ministre de la Justice Lametti sous les feux de la rampe

Editor

Published

on

[ad_1]

Le témoignage de M. Lametti, qui a succédé à Jody Wilson-Raybould dans ces fonctions à la mi-janvier, se mettra en branle à 10 h 45. Ceux du greffier du Conseil privé, Michael Wernick, et d’une sous-ministre à la Justice, Nathalie Drouin, auront lieu par la suite.

Il n’est pas clair que le témoignage de M. Lametti permettra d’en apprendre beaucoup plus sur cette affaire, qui a entraîné les démissions successives de Mme Wilson-Raybould et du secrétaire principal du premier ministre, Gerald Butts, et plombé les intentions de vote du Parti libéral à l’aube du prochain scrutin.

« Je vais dire ce que je peux dire. Évidemment, je ne peux pas dire ce que je ne peux pas dire », a-t-il commenté hier aux journalistes de la presse parlementaire qui le pressaient de questions.

Mme Wilson-Raybould doit comparaître devant ce même comité la semaine prochaine. On ne sait pas davantage ce que son témoignage pourra révéler, dans la mesure où elle demeure assujettie jusqu’à nouvel ordre par le secret professionnel, qui l’empêche de dévoiler des détails des discussions qu’elle a pu avoir avec M. Trudeau ou des membres de son entourage.

L’ex-ministre de la Justice et procureure générale du Canada a embauché l’ex-juge de la Cour suprême Thomas Cromwell, pour déterminer ce qu’elle peut dire.

« Je comprends totalement que les Canadiens veulent la vérité et la transparence. Il ne me revient pas de lever le secret professionnel. J’espère que j’aurai l’occasion de dire ma vérité », a-t-elle dit hier à la Chambre des communes.

Jody Wilson-Raybould debout à la Chambre des communes.« J’espère que j’aurai l’occasion de dire ma vérité », a déclaré Jody Wilson-Raybould, mercredi, à la Chambre des communes. Photo : Radio-Canada

Le premier ministre Trudeau a demandé au ministre Lametti d’étudier le bien-fondé de lever ce secret professionnel, mais ce dernier refuse de dire à quel moment cet avis pourra être rendu. « Je ne peux pas faire des commentaires sur le processus; ça fait partie de la confidentialité », a-t-il commenté mercredi.

En conférence de presse jeudi à Dartmouth, M. Trudeau a réitéré qu’il fallait faire « très attention » dans ce dossier, en évoquant la possibilité que des commentaires viennent interférer avec des procès en cours. « Le secret professionnel est un élément-clé de notre système de justice. Il y a des conséquences sérieuses potentielles si on lève ce secret professionnel », a-t-il dit.

Le premier ministre a également réitéré qu’il reste « déçu et surpris » par la démission de Mme Wilson-Raybould de démissionner de ses fonctions de ministre des Anciens combattants, qui lui ont été confiées lors du même remaniement ministériel qui a vu M. Lametti prendre ses anciennes tâches. « Cette décision n’est toujours pas claire pour moi », a-t-il ajouté.

Les partis d’opposition estiment que le comité parlementaire, qui est dominé par des députés libéraux, ne permettra pas d’en apprendre davantage tant et aussi longtemps que Mme Wilson-Raybould sera soumise au secret professionnel. Ils déplorent en outre que Gerald Butts n’ait pas été convoqué.

Selon le Globe and Mail, Mme Wilson-Raybould a subi des pressions de la part du bureau du premier ministre Trudeau pour que la directrice des poursuites pénales du Canada abandonne l’idée de poursuivre SNC-Lavalin pour des accusations de corruption relativement à ses activités en Libye.

Le quotidien torontois soutient que l’entourage du premier ministre aurait préféré que SNC-Lavalin se voie offrir un accord de réparation, une procédure qui permet à une compagnie poursuivie pour corruption de payer une amende, plutôt que d’être poursuivie en justice. Dans le cas de SNC-Lavalin, une condamnation en justice aurait pour conséquence de la priver de contrats publics pour 10 ans.

[ad_2]

Source link

قالب وردپرس

Headlines

Virtual farmer’s market comes to Ottawa

Editor

Published

on

By

Ottawa first-ever virtual farmer’s market has begun delivering food from local farms straight to people’s homes.

Farm to Hand is making it easier for people who cannot access their local farmer’s markets to find local, fresh organic food by bringing ordered food right to their doors. 

“The difference between us and the farmers market is really just the convenience and the on-demandness,” Sean Mallia, the co-founder of the business, told CBC Radio’s In Town and Out.

“[Often times a] person wants to make the purchase but they don’t have the time on Saturdays to go to the farmers market. Everyone wants to eat local … so when it’s easy for them to do it, it just happens.” In Town and Out No time to drive to the farmer’s market but really want to eat local?

Connecting farmers with people 

The online platform allows farmers to list all their own products, and buyers can have the goods delivered. 

“What we really are trying to do is build that connection between farmer and consumer,” Mallia said. “When people fill up a cart … they’re not just filling a cart full of food, they’re filling a cart full of farmers and farms and their stories.”

Mallia said the aim is to connect people to the “vibrant food ecosystem” around them, and to local support farmers.

The virtual market is currently limited to the Ottawa area as a pilot project, but Mallia, 21, said the company is looking to expand.

“[We chose Ottawa because] Ottawa really cares. Ottawa really thinks about local [food] and thinks about sustainability,” he said. “It just made sense to come out of Ottawa.”

Continue Reading

Headlines

Denley: Stonebridge and Mattamy show compromise is possible over development in Ottawa

Editor

Published

on

By

In Ottawa, development proposals too often end up in acrimony and trips to the provincial planning tribunal. That’s why it’s so refreshing to see Mattamy Homes and residents of the south Nepean suburb of Stonebridge work together to resolve a dispute in a way that’s likely to lead to a victory for both sides.

A little over a year ago, Mattamy created an uproar in the golf course community when it announced a plan to build 158 new homes on golf course lands and alter the Stonebridge course to make it shorter and less attractive to golfers. To residents, it looked like the first step in a plan to turn most, or all, of the course into housing.

It’s easy to see why residents were upset. When people pay a premium for a lot backing onto a golf course, there is certainly an implication that the lot will continue to back onto a golf course, but without a legally binding guarantee, it’s no sure thing.

Mattamy’s situation was understandable, too. This is a tough time to be in the golf course business in Ottawa. There are too many courses and not enough golfers so it’s no surprise that golf course owners would find the idea of turning a course into a housing development to be attractive, doubly so when the golf course is owned by a development company.

This is a tough time to be in the golf course business in Ottawa. There are too many courses and not enough golfers so it’s no surprise that golf course owners would find the idea of turning a course into a housing development to be attractive.

In the face of the local opposition, Mattamy withdrew its development application. When things cooled down, the company, the neighbours and the city started to work together on finding a solution that would satisfy everyone.

With the city-sponsored help of veteran planning consultant Jack Stirling, they came up with an unusual idea that will still let Mattamy develop its desired number of homes, in exchange for a promise to operate the course for at least 10 years and redesign it so that it remains attractive to golfers.

At the end of the 10 years, Mattamy can sell the course to the community for $6 million. To raise the money, the community working group is proposing a special levy to be paid by Stonebridge homeowners starting in 2021. The amount will range from $175 a year to $475 a year, depending on property values.

If the deal is approved by a majority of homeowners, Mattamy gets its development and a way out of the money-losing golf business. Homeowners get certainty about no future development. They can choose to keep the course going or retain the 198 acres as green space. It’s not a cheap solution, but it keeps their community as it is and preserves property values.

If a majority of homeowners backs the deal, both the levy and redevelopment will still need to be approved by the city, something scheduled for late this fall.

Stonebridge Community Association president Jay McLean was part of the working group that prepared the proposal and he’s pleased with the outcome. The community’s number one goal was preserving green space, and the deal will accomplish that, he says. Mattamy division president Kevin O’Shea says the deal “gives the community the certainty they are looking for.”

As useful as this deal could be for Stonebridge residents, it doesn’t provide a template to resolve a somewhat similar dispute in Kanata North, where the owner of the Kanata Lakes golf course wants to work with a group of local developers to replace the course with housing. In Kanata, a longstanding legal agreement saying the community has to have 40 per cent open space strengthens residents’ situation. In Stonebridge, there was no legal impediment to developing the whole course.

Golf course communities have become an anachronism in a city intent on intensifying within the urban boundary. Redeveloping those lands for housing is in sync with the city’s planning goals, but it’s not politically saleable to homeowners who thought they had a deal. If it goes ahead, the Stonebridge plan shows there is a reasonable middle ground.

Continue Reading

Headlines

City eyes five big themes for Ottawa’s new official plan

Editor

Published

on

By

As Ottawa maps out its future for the next 25-plus years, city staff propose focusing on five major areas, including the places we live and the ways we move around the capital.

A staff report to the city’s planning committee lays out five themes for future public consultations, before city council finalizes the plan.

1. Growth Management: City staff say Ottawa should focus on building up, rather than out. Staff also suggest the city provide direction on the type of new housing developments, rather than focusing on the number of units in a development, to encourage a wider variety of housing types.

2. Mobility: Staff say the city should encourage active transportation — like walking and cycling — and transit use by better co-ordinating land use and transportation planning. The report also encourages designing streets to better accomodate pedestrians and cyclists, as well as improving connections to the O-Train and Transitway.

3.  Urban and Community Design: Because Ottawa is a major city and the nation’s capital, staff say the design of our city’s buildings and skyline should be a higher calibre to reflect that status. Staff also suggest the city provide high-level direction for better designed parks and public spaces.

4. Climate, Energy and Public Health: Staff say residents’ health must be foundational to the city’s new official plan, with policies contributing to creating more inclusive, walkable, and sustainable communities.

5. Economic Development: Because much of Ottawa’s employment is knowledge-based, the city suggests those employment spaces could be better integrated into neighbourhoods and along main streets and transit nodes, instead of being isolated in business parks. City staff also suggest the city encourage more business incubation and identify opportunities to increase local food production.

The city’s new official plan will map out the city’s growth to 2046. The five themes and the plan’s high-level policy direction will go before the city’s planning committee, next week.

Public consultation and fine-tuning is expected to happen before city council approves the final version of the new official plan in 2021.

Continue Reading

Chat

Trending