Connect with us


Calgary’s moment of choice: How the city can break its mould but preserve its soul





EDITOR’S NOTE: This is the fourth in a five-part series that’s a little different from what you usually read on CBC. In it, we add new reporting and analysis to the work of dozens of writers who have contributed to our Calgary at a Crossroads and Road Ahead projects over the past three years. The goal is to take stock of the turbulent times we’ve been through while exploring where we’re headed next — and how we might get there.

Calgary is one of those cities that’s made up, largely, of people who have come from somewhere else, but Peter Schryvers is one of those rare 30-somethings who was born and raised here.

As he grew up, he watched the city grow up around him, in fits and starts.

The Calgary of his childhood was home to just over 600,000 people — a vastly different place from the city of more than 1.2 million where now chooses to make his adult life, as a city planner. And “choose” is the key word there, both for Schryvers, personally, and for the future he envisions for Calgary.

“We need to build a city that people choose to live in,” he said.

In the first three parts of this Road Ahead series, we’ve explored choice — economic and political choices, choices about our perceptions and expectations — on the provincial level. We’ve explored the complexity of the challenges Alberta faces, and how it will take a multiplicity of changes, big and small, to chart a future path for our province.

Calgary, meanwhile, faces its own set of specific choices.

These choices are likely to be generational, in nature. Or, at the very least, affect different generations in different ways. Together, we must decide how to build our city for a future that won’t look like its past. How to grow beyond our roots as a town dominated by a single industry. How to shed old stereotypes that might now hold us back, while staying true to our city’s soul.

There are good reasons to care about this social stuff — it has economic consequences.

Cities don’t just happen

In practical terms, Schryvers says Calgary must reckon with how to attract more people — particularly talented young people — to come and build their lives here, even during hard economic times. To be in it for the long haul, because they see more on offer from this place than a fat but capricious paycheque.

Cities that pull this off, experts say, can reap long-lasting rewards. A healthy supply of skilled workers and innovative entrepreneurs can help build a diverse, resilient economy with enough critical mass to carry considerable momentum through downturns. It’s a way we could sidestep the cycle of boom and bust.

But cities don’t just happen. They are the collective result of countless decisions made by governments, institutions and individuals. And the choices we make don’t come with guaranteed outcomes. Mistakes are inevitable.

This moment in Calgary’s history, it seems, is particularly well suited to reflect on who we are, discern what we want to become and how we might get there.

At this point in its evolution, Calgary could be described as an “arriviste city.”

A ‘supermoon’ shines over downtown Calgary and a swollen Bow River. (Robson Fletcher/CBC)

The word “arriviste” refers to someone who is “just beginning to ‘arrive,’ in the sense of achieving success or making a name for oneself.” For some, that word can carry negative connotations, in the way that old money looks down on the nouveau riche. (Not that the tut-tutting of establishment types has ever been of much concern to maverick Calgary.)

Harry Hiller, an urban sociology professor at the University of Calgary, sees us as “arriviste” in another sense, too.

“An arriviste city is a city that has broken out of its old mould and is becoming something new,” he wrote, in an analysis of Calgary’s identity. “It is still in process and has not arrived at an end state but what is significant is that it challenges the old urban hierarchy to which other Canadians have developed their stereotypes.”

How often have you had friends visit from out east and say, “Wow, Calgary isn’t what I expected!” That’s the mould being broken. That’s the mental image of the city morphing from simply “Cowtown” to something more complex.

Schryvers, quite deliberately, has ensconced himself in the increasingly cosmopolitan side of Calgary. These are the physical, social and economic spheres inhabited by a growing part of the population that he says some older Calgarians may dismiss as “a bunch of hipsters” but will actually play a pivotal role in the city’s future.

These are the types of people who, by luxury or necessity (or a little bit of both) are transmetropolitan. They aren’t tied to a particular city.

They’re able and willing to pick up sticks, move and put down roots somewhere else.

At least, while they’re still young.

The young and restless

Now, these are not the same folks who came to Calgary to make some quick cash during the boom, before blowing out of town the minute things got rough.

“The people who came to make a fast buck are gone,” Calgary historian and writer Aritha Van Herk wrote back in 2016. “The acquisitive and mercenary have left. They weren’t here for the long haul, the bumpy ride. They worked for pay, and not for pleasure.”

The transmetropolitans, by contrast, tend to put a bit more emphasis on the latter half of that pay-pleasure balance. A good income is important, of course, but many are looking to get something more out of their daily toils — even their daily commutes.

“I have one friend who lives in Hillhurst who gets to commute into work downtown every day across the Peace Bridge,” said Peter Oliver, president of the Beltline Neighbourhoods Association.

“And that little commute each day, while mundane to so many other people … is a really defining point in his lifestyle, and I think his entire outlook on life. … He says something to the effect of, ‘If you get to see beauty once a day, you’re living a beautiful life.'”

Calgary’s Peace Bridge over the Bow River, seen from below in summer. (Robson Fletcher/CBC)

The idea of a daily bike ride over the Bow River being so pivotal to one’s sense of belonging in a city might sound trivial, even silly, to some.

But it’s a reality that urban planners think about as they make city-building decisions in an effort to compete for citizens with other metropolitan centres across the world.

There are big implications to this competition for young talent.

Which comes first: People or jobs?

It is perhaps too easy to think of our city, and whether one wants to live here, in terms of the traditional migration patterns.

First, came the jobs. Good ones. Then came the people, ready and willing to work. When the jobs dried up, many of those same people left.

But as, we’ve seen in part three of this series, the future of the economy won’t look like the past. Things are already changing and, increasingly, companies are looking at access to skilled labour when deciding where to locate their businesses.

This has turned the old pattern on its head.

“Probably for the first time in history, instead of people moving where jobs are, jobs are moving where the talent is,” Tom Murphy, a senior fellow at the Urban Land Institute, told Governing magazine in 2016.

And these days, many skilled, educated young people — with the ability to make a life in any number of cities — are choosing where to live based on a broader range of factors than just money, gravitating especially toward urban centres rich in amenities.

Can craft beer help a city diversify its economy? Research says yes. (Windsor Craft Beer Festival/Facebook)

It may sound airy-fairy — all beard wax, craft beer and espresso machines. But social-science research has found a correlation between civic “vibrancy” and higher levels of entrepreneurial activity.

And it’s increasingly recognized in both academic and professional circles that recruiting and retaining talent — especially talented young people — also relates to how we physically design a city, the urban geography we create, the nature that surrounds us and the social complexity of our communities.

In other words, if we make our city interesting and pleasant enough, it will help us diversify the economy. That’s something that’s ostensibly been a mission for years in this city, but remains a work in progress, especially when it comes to attracting young people.

Because lately, we’ve been losing them.

Bleeding youth

In the last two years that Calgary’s civic census asked residents how old they are, the population in every age range grew except for one.

The lone outlier was 20-to-24-year-olds, whose ranks shrunk by about 4,000 from 2014 to 2016.

“That’s massively concerning because, again, that’s the mobile population,” Schryvers said. “If they’re moving away, then we’re losing our competitive advantage.”

Recall the deficiencies that were already highlighted in Calgary’s workforce after our failure to make the short list for Amazon’s HQ2. That was a long shot bid, of course, but a lack of pre-existing talent in the high-tech industry remains an obstacle in attracting other potential employers, as well.

Why are we losing so many young people?

After all, we just finished hearing how many of today’s youth are looking for more than a traditional 9-to-5 job. That a steady paycheque may no longer be a sufficient condition to convince them to stay.

That said, it’s still a necessary one. Everyone needs to eat before they need a beautiful commute.

Kaydan Pring spoke to CBC News in 2018 about what it’s been like looking for work in Calgary, while standing in line at a youth job fair. (Terri Trembath/CBC)

And, for a lot of young people lately — especially those at the earliest stage of adulthood — Calgary hasn’t been the most attractive place to make a go at making a living. Employment rates among Calgarians under the age of 25 are at their lowest point in decades. The situation is particularly dire for young men.

So how do we make things better?

In part, by re-tooling our offerings — and expectations — around post-secondary education.

The changing nature and value of education

Go to school. Get a degree or diploma. Get a job.

It was a pretty standard life plan and, up until recently, there were many in Calgary for whom this trajectory ended with “make lots of money.”  (Some skipped the “get diploma” part altogether and jumped right to money, straight out of high school.)

But that’s no longer the reality. The money part isn’t as easy as it once was. Young people now face a future that’s more uncertain, and choices that look much different.

In an opinion piece for CBC a couple years back, Colleen Bangs, manager of career services at the University of Calgary, offered some advice to recent grads who found themselves thrust into a job market that didn’t look the same as when they started their degrees.

“Even though wallowing in defeat and deeming the last four years useless might seem like a reasonable option, it isn’t going to change the price of oil,” she wrote. “Make a plan and stick to it. Reset your expectations and get to work creating your own opportunities.”

Employment after graduation isn’t what it used to be. (Andrew Vaughan/Canadian Press)

Brad Donaldson, vice-president academic at SAIT, also explained just how much things changed during the downturn.

“One of the challenges in the energy sector in the past 10 years was salaries and wages inflating beyond the value of the job description. Students were leaving SAIT midway through a program and starting in their ‘dream job’ at the age of 20,” he wrote, back in 2016.

“Today, we’re re-adjusting and managing expectations. Students should be encouraged to find a job — any job — in their chosen industry and work their way up through the field. Everyone needs to earn their way to highly coveted positions.”

In Alberta, during the oil boom, many students opted to skip post-secondary altogether and even drop out of high school to work instead. Back in 2011, we had the lowest graduation rate of any province for a reason. When job offers abound, why wait to finish Grade 12 before you start collecting a paycheque?

How times have changed.

After the oil-price crash, it’s been a “tale of two labour markets,” says University of Calgary economist Trevor Tombe: one for those who have a post-secondary education, and one for those who don’t.

Take a look at this chart to see what he means.

That orange line at the top shows the growth in employment among university-educated Albertans: about 100,000 more people working now, compared to October 2014.

The blue and purple lines, respectively, show those with a diploma and those with some degree of post-secondary education. They’re faring OK, but not great. Their employment is up, but just barely.

It’s the people represented by the green and red lines who have suffered the most in the current job market. They’re the ones with a high school education or less, and there are roughly 150,000 fewer of them working today.

Consider for a moment the enormous change in fortune these people, mostly men, have endured. Imagine the frustration, to set out on a life course that seemed so viable at first —  and was, for a time — and then see that path come to an abrupt dead end.

The challenges they now face in adapting to the new economic reality are enormous. But adaptation is something that many individuals — and institutions — must do in light of all that’s changed.

As Donaldson put it: “Industry, government and post-secondaries all have to evolve — this is not the time to maintain status quo.”

‘Every profession evolves’

The University of Calgary has changed, too, with major revamps of the curricula in numerous faculties that are “tailored to address needs in the community and in the marketplace.”

One challenge for both universities and colleges, however, is class size — as in, there’s not enough of them.

“We have a capacity issue in post-secondaries in Alberta — we are well behind the number of seats that we should have,” Adam Legge with the Haskayne School of Business told CBC News in late 2018.

Students at the University of Alberta campus in Edmonton. Adam Legge, with the University of Calgary’s Haskayne School of Business, says Alberta needs more post-secondary capacity, in general, but notes Edmonton already has more than Calgary. (Trevor Wilson/CBC)

“Edmonton has way more seats than Calgary does,” Legge added. “It’s an issue that, where I’m at now, the University of Calgary, we’ve been advocating very strongly for years and years that access to post-secondary needs to grow in Calgary, and overall in Alberta. And until we solve that problem, we’ll have a constrained pipeline of new graduates coming out to fill our labour needs.”

(Nice touch that, “constrained pipeline.”)

Even with more seats in more classes, however, the personal decisions facing prospective students as they consider what to study remain difficult and complex.

What course or program could lead to future prosperity? It’s not as clear as it once was.

And, as we’ve seen, what looks like a viable path today could turn out to be a dead end tomorrow.

Life-long learning

This challenge of choice is no longer limited to high-school students enrolling in post secondary.

Yes, they must choose the type of education they want to pursue. But many Calgarians who were mid-career — until the bust — have been forced to make similar choices, too, about re-educating themselves. Even some people with jobs are choosing to retrain in anticipation of future demands in the job market.

It’s to that end that the Schulich School of Engineering at the University of Calgary has launched a one-year masters degree in software engineering.

Meghan McGee and Julian Mulia are students in a new, one-year masters program with a focus on software engineering at the University of Calgary. (Riley Brandt/University of Calgary)

The program is aimed at people who already have an engineering degree in other fields —  civil, electrical, chemical, whatever — and are already in the industry, but want to add another tool to their toolbox, and a particularly versatile one, at that.

Software engineering, as a standalone skill, is in high demand, says Bill Rosehart, dean of the engineering school, but is increasingly applicable to all sorts of other fields, as well.

“We think this is going to create a high-impact tech workforce to support our city and our province,” he said of the program.

All well and good, on a macro level.

For many of us, though, the idea of having to going back to school after already earning a degree or two and gaining experience in an industry, just to keep current, might sound exhausting. And what if you choose wrong? And have to go through it all again?

That’s always a possibility. But at least this is one area where we have some agency.

We may not be able to control the economy. We may have limited ability to influence government policy. We may not control the technological changes that disrupt the job market on an increasingly frequent basis. What we can decide is what part of the economy we hope to participate in. We can choose what we learn, and that can be a lifelong thing.

Education for education’s sake won’t necessarily put food on the table and a roof over your head.

But it can help — both individually and collectively, as a city.

Engineering, business, trades

Court Ellingson with Calgary Economic Development says one advantage the city already enjoys is a relatively high proportion of people with degrees in areas like engineering and business, which he believes is helping us prepare for the new economy.

“You’re much more likely and better prepared to go out and start your own company or join a company when you’ve got that higher level of education,” Ellingson says.

And it’s not just university; skilled trades continue to be a route to success, as well. In Alberta, men with apprenticeship certificates earned “more than men with a bachelor’s degree in every other province,” according to the 2016 census. (And that was during the depths of the downturn.)

Alberta men with an apprenticeship certificate earned more than men with a bachelor’s degree in every other province, according to the 2016 census. (Jacques Boissinot/Canadian Press)

Well-trained workers and willing entrepreneurs are only one half of the equation, though. For them to thrive, they need to paired with good employers and strong sources of capital investment. No matter how educated or skilled you are, it’s hard to get off the ground without some cash to kick things off.

And while wooing people may be increasingly important, cities still need to woo companies, as well. As we saw in the third part of this series, there is substantial economic benefit in luring new business investment to the city.

And here, once again, urban design plays a role.

Other cities have found success through purpose-built communities for both work and play, and even an emphasis on the finer things that city life can offer.

Clusters of vibrancy

“Growing companies do not just choose a location randomly,” wrote urban studies theorist Richard Florida.

“Rather, they cluster and concentrate in the more vibrant parts of both urban and suburban areas.”

This is something that Denver found, when it went through something of a revolution after a downturn of its own. Seeking to diversify the economy, the city also decided to spruce itself up — a civic makeover — which, through targeted tax breaks and a strategic design plan, made the city a sexier place to live, particularly for younger people.

It was widely recognized as a success.

Denver “has risen from economic stagnation and urban irrelevance to become a millennial magnet,” the New York Times wrote in a 2016 article that detailed the city’s approach to attracting youth.

Two cities with very similar skylines. On the left is Calgary’s East Village and on the right is downtown Denver. (Micheal J/Flickr/The Associated Press)

Calgary has been trying to do something similar.

Take the East Village. University of Calgary environmental design professor Francisco Alaniz Uribe sees the community as the new standard for urban design in this city. The key, he says, is the “high-quality public realm.”

But, of course, this realm took decades of planning, still isn’t done, and cost a lot of cash.

Meanwhile, individual Calgarians, local communities and city planners are making choices every day about the design of the city. But the process is messy, and not everyone likes the decisions that have to be made. The debate often pits different groups against each other.

How do we densify? How tall is too tall for a tower in an older neighbourhood? Do all streets need sidewalks? Are bike paths a godsend or a barrier? Should we continue to build on the outskirts of the city?

No one said choices would be easy.

Our elected representatives on city council are now facing some major decisions, of their own, when it comes to a new arena, a broader entertainment district, upgrades to Arts Commons, an expansion to the BMO Centre and construction of a fieldhouse. The price tags for these projects, together, could reach into the billions of dollars. Which can we afford?

And in return for an investment of so much public money, how much more “vibrant” can we expect our city to become? Can we even quantify such a thing?

The reality is, we don’t know, for sure. The choices are hard, the outcomes uncertain.

But there is an impetus to act, or risk being left behind.

Build it and sell it

Even if we are able to restructure our city and build both suburban and urban vitality, today, there is increasingly stiff global competition to attract the brightest young minds to the metropolitan centres of the world.

Calgary may still be a small fry in this vast sea, but we like to think we can swim with the big fish.

Attracting young talent remains a deliberate strategy of Calgary Economic Development, which recently targeted Vancouver and Seattle with an ad campaign aimed at wooing young, urban professionals — particularly those working in the tech sector — away from the West Coast.

Promising that the “grass is greener on the other side of the Rockies,” the campaign highlighted not just the lower rents and taxes in Calgary, but the lifestyle advantages. (Though there may be those who would argue the proximity to Banff can’t make up for six months of winter in town.)

Yellow larch trees and snow capped mountains seen from Healy Pass in Banff National Park, a short drive from Calgary. (Robson Fletcher/CBC)

And while West Coast residents have mountains of their own, Calgary’s proximity to the Rockies shouldn’t be overlooked as a draw for people from other places.

“Regardless of what you told your parents or texted your friends when you crossed the Prairies to pitch your tent here, you didn’t come to Calgary just for a job,” the CBC’s David Gray wrote in an analysis of how the mountains shape our city.

“If you’re honest, you chose to move here in the prime of your life — move your family and plant down roots — because of what you saw in the tourist brochure. It was the whiff of adventure, the possibility of freedom and the notion of a life unrestrained. The mountains called you.”

Even the smallest decisions about how we market our city can have impact.

Freelance journalist Cailynn Klingbeil, who frequently explores urban affairs in her work, analyzed the evolution of our city’s welcome signs on the side of the highway. “If the words and pictures we use to communicate a vision of ourselves are malleable,” she wrote, “does that make our identity uncertain?”

And isn’t that what this all boils down to? A question of identity.

An identity we can discern, market, and perhaps use to capture the imaginations of would-be residents of our ever-expanding city. One that can be further shaped by those who come to take part in this collective experience we call Calgary.

As we contemplate questions like this, Rev. John Pentland believes it’s important to look inward to discern who we truly are, and what type of new thing we want to become.

‘A pioneering city’

“Calgary is a pioneering city, a place of ideas, of vision and possibility,” the Hillhurst United Church minister wrote of the city’s identity.

“This is the city of possibilities. If you live in Canada, and you have an idea, this is the place to fly them. This is the place to be.”

Pentland wrote that on Christmas Day 2015, during the depths of the downturn. It was a time of soul searching, both individually and collectively, a process he says requires “deep listening” and “wrestling with questions” like “Who am I?” and “What am I being called to do?” and “What matters most?”

“These kinds of questions deepen our purpose in the world,” Pentland wrote. “It becomes less about accomplishing something and more about being someone worthwhile in the world.”

Our sense of who we are is intricately connected with the place where we live, writes Aritha Van Herk. (Jim LeGilloux)

Van Herk, the writer, had this to say about those hardy souls who stuck it out in Calgary through the last bust: “The people who stay have committed themselves to living here, perhaps despite themselves, and will work to make this city theirs, to find the good bones underneath the surface, embrace the shimmer at its heart.”

The same could perhaps be said of the next wave of people who come from elsewhere, consciously choosing Calgary, putting down roots and building a life in this, particular place.

They will change the city, but the city will change them, too. Our maverick history made present.

But that is part five of The Road Ahead.

This is part four of a five-part series. Look for the final part Sunday.

The Road Ahead is CBC Calgary’s ongoing, special focus on our city and province as they pass through the crucible of the downturn: the challenges we face and possible solutions, as we explore what kind of future we want to create. And we’re looking for your perspective. Have an idea for a future story? Email us:


Source link

قالب وردپرس


Why China is vulnerable to its own economic crash… and why it’s so desperate to keep screwing America with unfair trade deals





(Natural News) The administration of President Richard Nixon sought to ‘normalize’ relations with China in the early 1970s in large part to use the Asian giant as a bulwark against our superpower rival, the Soviet Union.

It made sense since China and the USSR had recently fought a vicious border war (1969) and though both were communist nations, they did not trust or like each other. 

Over the next few decades, the U.S. sought to integrate China into the West as a means of cracking open its vast market; a billion people is a tempting economic magnet. But also, it was hoped that by strengthening China economically, that would mitigate the authoritarian leadership of the Communist Party and even lead to its demise as the Chinese people embraced capitalism and the freedom it embodies.

By all accounts, U.S. policy objectives did not bear fruit. 

“The United States made a gamble that as China became more and more involved on the global stage, it would open up domestically and become a constructive stakeholder in the … international system. It’s pretty clear that gamble hasn’t paid off in the way we hoped it would,” said Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Foreign Relations Committee during a hearing on China’s rise May 8.

For years, subsequent U.S. administrations ignored not just China’s rise but the manner in which it was rising: Grossly unfair trading arrangements with the U.S., China’s largest (by far) export market. 

Donald Trump promised to fix this massive trade imbalance during his 2016 campaign and he’s certainly giving it his best effort, having implemented a tariff regime aimed at forcing Beijing’s ruling Communist Party to accept better trade terms with Washington.

Sponsored solution from the Health Ranger Store: Lab-verified Nascent Iodine solution is a dietary supplement that provides your body with supplemental iodine to help protect your thyroid during radiation exposure. Nuclear accidents such as Fukushima (or nuclear war) can expose your body to radioactive iodine-131, a dangerous radioisotope. Pre-loading your system with stable iodine occupies the iodine receptor sites on your organs, causing your body to naturally expel radioactive iodine you may have been exposed to through air, food, water or milk products. This defensive strategy is recommended by nearly all health authorities, worldwide, including the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Discover more at this link.

However, according to a report this week from SinoInsider, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) may be about to unveil an economic “Pearl Harbor” attack on the U.S. in order to not simply save their own economy but also to remain in power.

China’s leaders may be getting desperate

According to the analysis website, it’s possible due to a confluence of events allegedly occurring inside China now, the CCP may decide that “unrestricted warfare” strategies to include potential military action as well may be ‘necessary’ in order to perpetuate party leadership:

— China is currently being pressured by a deteriorating economy and rising social unrest around the country;

— As the Trump administration’s tariff regime continues and, perhaps, grows (POTUS threatened to expand tariffs to even more Chinese goods after the upcoming G-20 meeting), the CCP could begin to get more desperate.

That means:

— The Chinese may seek to disrupt American financial markets (even as POTUS Trump’s policies and the GOP tax cut have led to record growth). This could come as soon as this month as new 25-percent tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods take effect.

— “The CCP could seek to influence and interfere in U.S. politics and society,” the report noted. No doubt this would take the form of Russian interference in the 2016 election (few people doubt that Moscow attempted to interfere; it’s just that the Trump campaign wasn’t in on it).

— The CCP may “find ways to influence politicians in both major parties to disrupt governance or Trump’s policies.” For example, the party could seek to have the president’s tariff authority restricted, though there doesn’t seem to be a congressional majority in both chambers of Congress for that to happen over a presidential veto.

There are other potential disruptions as well, SinoInsider reports, including increased Chinese influence in Europe and Asia to fracture American alliances and weaken Washington’s position around the world — though China’s money only goes so far because it comes with CCP authoritarianism. (Related: Gingrich: China’s economy ‘can’t take the battering’ POTUS Trump is set to deliver.)

The Chinese economy could be in a similar position as the U.S. economy in 2007-08: Dangerously overextended and on the verge of collapse. That would have negative global economic implications, just like our collapse did.

Continue Reading


Abortion advocates claim “medical” reasons for abortion include the mother changing her mind about pregnancy





(Natural News) One of the oft-repeated arguments by pro-deathers in favor of legalized abortion contends that women sometimes need to murder their unborn children for “medical” reasons, and that we shouldn’t deprive them of this “right.” But as admitted by Death Cult Disciple Leah Torres, the word “medical” can mean pretty much anything in the context of abortion, including a woman’s desire to simply no longer be pregnant.

During a recent interview with Dank Pro-Life Memes, Torres openly admitted that not wanting to be pregnant anymore is a valid “medical” reason for wanting an abortion, as is simply changing one’s mind about having a baby. Torres also contends that abortion is just another medical procedure whereby the “products of conception are removed from the uterine cavity” – hence why she also believes that everyone, including people who support abortion, are somehow “pro-life.”

Though she previously stated on Twitter that unborn babies are, in fact, “human beings,” Torres apparently doesn’t believe that unborn human life has any value whatsoever, let alone human rights. In her view, unborn babies are a “medical indication” for women by their very existence, which means that women should have the right to deal with unborn human life however they see fit until it “no longer alters maternal physiology and no longer poses health and life risks to pregnant people.”

In other words, unborn babies are a burden on pregnant women, according to Torres, which means these women have a right to unburden themselves through abortion if they so choose. It’s the epitome of selfish disregard for society’s most vulnerable, and yet this is considered to be “progress” in the eyes of death-loving Leftists who refuse to take personal responsibility for their own reproductive organs by not getting pregnant in the first place.

100% organic essential oil sets now available for your home and personal care, including Rosemary, Oregano, Eucalyptus, Tea Tree, Clary Sage and more, all 100% organic and laboratory tested for safety. A multitude of uses, from stress reduction to topical first aid. See the complete listing here, and help support this news site.

For related news, be sure to check out

Abortion is NEVER medically necessary, nor does it EVER save women’s lives

Though it might seem to be factual considering how often it’s repeated by pro-deathers, the truth is that abortion is never medically necessary. It’s also a fact that getting an abortion has never saved a single woman’s life – this, according to former abortionist Dr. Anthony Levatino.

“Dr. Levatino has saved hundreds of pregnant women’s lives, working against the clock in the face of devastating health situations, and not once did he find that it was medically necessary to deliberately kill the unborn baby,” write Lila Rose and Donna Harrison for the Washington Examiner.

“Abortion is not a procedure done in true emergency situations. The purpose of an abortion is to produce a dead baby, not to separate the mother and the baby.”

But if you try to explain any of this to members of the Death Cult, you likely won’t get very far. That’s because those obsessed with abortion have been programmed to trigger immediately upon being challenged, demonstrating that they’re unable to receive and digest actual facts that contradict their deranged world view, which perceives violent murder as some kind of “virtue.”

And they have Roe v. Wade as backing, of course, seeing as how the vaguely-written court ruling defines “medical” reasons for abortion as “all factors – physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman’s age – relevant to the well-being of the patient.”

“This vague language means women can have an abortion for any reason whatsoever, and it can be marked up to an issue of emotional health,” writes Cassy Fiano-Chesser for

“And while Torres breezily waves off ‘not being pregnant anymore’ as a medical reason for an abortion, the reality is that most Americans strongly oppose this kind of pro-abortion extremism.”

“And while Torres breezily waves off ‘not being pregnant anymore’ as a medical reason for an abortion, the reality is that most Americans strongly oppose this kind of pro-abortion extremism.”

Continue Reading


GOP Sen. Hawley introduces bill to force YouTube to end its “catering to pedophiles” even as the platform bans conservatives and indy media





(Natural News) As Missouri’s attorney general, Josh Hawley went after the big tech platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube for allegedly violating the privacy rights of the citizens of his state, as well as other practices that were inconsistent and unfair.

As a U.S. senator, Hawley has continued his quest to hold these behemoths accountable as they selectively enforce “community standards” that allow them to discriminate against conservatives and independent media while coddling those engaged in disgusting and potentially illegal behavior.

As reported by Fox News on Thursday, GOP Sen. Hawley introduced legislation “that would force video-sharing websites such as YouTube to turn off their recommendation systems for videos featuring children.”

Specifically, Hawley’s legislation comes after a New York Times report noting that the video platform’s algorithm system has curated and recommended scores of videos featuring children, which is helping to spread such content to predators and their associates.

The Times noted that a Brazilian woman named “Christiane C.” was initially unconcerned when her 10-year-old daughter and a friend uploaded a video of themselves as they splashed and played in a backyard pool.

“The video is innocent, it’s not a big deal,” the woman, who lives in a suburb of Rio de Janeiro, told the paper.

But soon her daughter excitedly informed her that the video received thousands of views. Within a short time, it garnered more than 400,000 views, “a staggering number for a video of a child in a two-piece bathing suit with her friend,” the Times noted.

Support our mission and enhance your own self-reliance: The laboratory-verified Organic Emergency Survival Bucket provides certified organic, high-nutrition storable food for emergency preparedness. Completely free of corn syrup, MSG, GMOs and other food toxins. Ultra-clean solution for years of food security. Learn more at the Health Ranger Store.

Then Christiane became very “scared,” and for good reason. The Times added: 

YouTube’s automated recommendation system — which drives most of the platform’s billions of views by suggesting what users should watch next — had begun showing the video to users who watched other videos of prepubescent, partially clothed children, a team of researchers has found.

This is a much needed first step

In February, YouTube disabled comments on many videos featuring children. But the recommendation system remained intact and continues to push them out to pedophiles and other predators. (Related: Google, Facebook, YouTube censorship of conservative sites, voices just like Communist CHINA.)

Now, YouTube has been reducing such recommendations, but Hawley says that’s not good enough.

“Every parent in America should be appalled that YouTube is pushing videos of their children to pedophiles,” he said, in a statement obtained by Fox News. “It’s equally outrageous that YouTube refuses to take the most effective step necessary to fix the issue. I’m proud to announce this legislation to force YouTube to do the right thing and place children’s safety over profits and pedophiles.”

If passed, the legislation will impose stiff fines and criminal penalties for violations, but it would only apply to videos that primarily feature minors — not all videos that happen to have minors in the background, for instance. Also, professionally-produced videos such as those for talent shows and whatnot would also be exempted.

In response, YouTube has also begun updating enforcement of the company’s live-streaming policy in order to prevent minors, especially younger children, from uploading videos unless an adult is clearly accompanying them.

But what about other actions taken by YouTube that involve outright bans, especially of conservatives and independent publishers like Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, founder/editor of Natural News? Or the defunding of other popular conservatives such as Steven Crowder of TheBlazeTV, which just occurred this week?

Is Congress prepared to begin treating these social media Nazis like public utilities, meaning they can be regulated? While raking in billions of dollars off of video content uploaded to giants like YouTube and Facebook, the companies then claim they’re not responsible because they’re a private-sector distribution platform.

These companies can’t — or shouldn’t — have it both ways. Hawley’s legislation, if it passes, is a much-needed first step at reigning in discriminatory practices by the social media behemoths.

Continue Reading